← All case studies/SaaS demo page redesign

SaaS demo page design: three versions tested, one clear winner

This product adoption platform sells to B2B product teams, and every button on its homepage leads to one place: "Get a Demo". The demo page was a dark panel with four checkmarks and a three-field form. It never said what happens on the call or what it costs. Demo pages are a low-hanging fruit, so I designed three versions and tested them against the original.

+12,6%demo requests
+11,8%demo show rate
+8,9%demos held

Use the switcher at the bottom left to see all three tested versions. Switch to Before to see the original demo page.

A/B test results against the original page
  1. +12,6%demo requestsVersion B: what you get from the 30 minutes
  2. +11,8%demo show rateAn agenda built around your goal, in the invite
  3. +8,9%demos heldShow rate up, bookings −2,6% from the two extra questions
The problem

Every button leads to a demo page that doesn't sell the demo

On the homepage, "Get a Demo" is the main button in the header, the hero and three more sections. The free trial is a text link in the menu. So the demo page is where this company's pipeline starts.

The homepage: "Get a Demo" is the main button
The demo page it leads to

The demo page asked for name, work email and company size, under "Book a 30-min demo call with expert advice". It didn't say what the 30 minutes cover, who it's for, or what the product costs. A product manager deciding whether to give up half an hour had nothing to go on.

What a product manager asksWhat the old page gave themStatus
What will I get from 30 minutes?"Expert advice"Missing
Will it be about my problem?No question about the goalMissing
What does it cost?Not on the pageMissing
Who else uses it?Four small logos at the bottom of a dark panelHidden
What happens after I submit?Not saidMissing
A demo request is a promise of 30 minutes. The page never said what those 30 minutes are worth.
What I changed

I designed three demo pages and tested them against the original

Each version answers the missing questions a different way. All three use the same two-step form: details and the goal first, then a calendar. Everything below the first screen is the same, so the test isolates the first screen.

Original
Original: checkmarks and a three-field form
A · Form over the product
Version A: the form over a blurred view of the product
B · What you get in 30 minutesWinner
Version B: three things you leave the call with, beside the form
C · Proof beside the form
Version C: a customer result and the security badges beside the form

Version A puts the form over a blurred screen of the product, so the visitor sees what they're booking. Version B lists the three things you leave the call with: a walkthrough of your problem, a first-flow plan, and pricing for your user count, with the starting price on the page. Version C puts a customer result, the G2 rating and the security badges beside the form.

Version B won. A visitor deciding whether to give up 30 minutes wants to know what they get, and B is the only version that says it in plain words.

Conversion principleSell the outcome of the call, not the call (value proposition). "A first-flow plan and your price" is a reason to book; "expert advice" is not.

A/B test result: +12,6% demo requests from this change, tested against the original page

I made the demo about the visitor's goal, and told them the agenda

In a second test I changed what happens around the booking. The form asks two new questions: what do you want to fix first (activation, adoption, support tickets, churn) and how many monthly active users you have. Then a calendar, on the page. The confirmation and the invite list a 30-minute agenda built around the goal they picked.

Step 1: details, the goal and user count
How the demo works: book, get the agenda, see it on a product like yours

Two extra questions cost a few bookings: demo bookings fell 2,6%. But more of the people who booked actually turned up, because the call was now about their problem and they knew what to bring.

Conversion principleA specific agenda creates commitment (commitment and consistency). People keep appointments that feel made for them.

A/B test result: +11,8% demo show rate and +8,9% demos held from this change, tested against the original page

I gave the demo page a full page below the form

The original demo page was one screen. The new one continues for people who scroll before they book: how the demo works, three customer results, what you'll see on the call, four questions (including "can I just try it instead?", with a link to the free trial), a closing call to action and a full footer.

Results from teams who started with one problem
What you'll see on the call
Questions people ask before they book
The closing call to action

Conversion principleKeep the main action the same as the page that sent the visitor (consistency). The homepage sells a demo, so the demo page does too; the trial stays a secondary link for people who prefer it.

On a phone
Before, on a phone
After, on a phone
Why it worked

Why these changes worked

A demo request asks a busy product manager for 30 minutes. The original page offered "expert advice" and nothing else. Of three new versions, the one that listed exactly what you leave with, including the price for your user count, won: demo requests rose 12,6%.

Asking for the goal and the user count cost 2,6% of bookings, but the call became about the visitor's own problem, with the agenda in the invite. Show rate rose 11,8%, and demos held, the number sales cares about, rose 8,9%.

Let's talk

Let's find out why your visitors aren't buying.

Send me the page. On the call I'll tell you what I'd fix first, what it could move, and whether I'm the right person for it.

Book a call